Skip to content

feat(oxlint): Add camelcase eslint rule #15912

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Draft
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

feat(oxlint): Add camelcase eslint rule #15912

wants to merge 2 commits into from
+600 −0

Conversation

@infalmo
Copy link

@infalmo infalmo commented Nov 20, 2025

No description provided.

@graphite-app
Copy link
Contributor

graphite-app bot commented Nov 20, 2025

How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add either label to this PR to merge it via the merge queue:

  • 0-merge - adds this PR to the back of the merge queue
  • hotfix - for urgent hot fixes, skip the queue and merge this PR next

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the A-linter Area - Linter label Nov 20, 2025
@infalmo infalmo changed the title Add camelcase eslint rule feat(oxlint): Add camelcase eslint rule Nov 20, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the C-enhancement Category - New feature or request label Nov 20, 2025
@infalmo
Copy link
Author

infalmo commented Nov 20, 2025

Have made a first implementation of the lint rule. Haven't implemented the ignoreGlobals rule. Is there a checklist on the things to do before this is merged?

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Nov 20, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #15912 will not alter performance

Comparing infalmo:camelCase (89c88a2) with main (6d14c8b)1

Summary

✅ 4 untouched
⏩ 41 skipped2

Footnotes

  1. No successful run was found on main (15d367a) during the generation of this report, so 6d14c8b was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

  2. 41 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports. ↩

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@camc314 camc314 Awaiting requested review from camc314 camc314 will be requested when the pull request is marked ready for review camc314 is a code owner

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

A-linter Area - Linter C-enhancement Category - New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant

@infalmo